Marbury vs Madison - The Cricketing Equivalent

Imagine you're a young Rohit Sharma, just starting out in the Indian cricket team. You've been selected for a crucial match, but your captain, Virat Kohli, hasn't included you in the playing XI. You feel you were unfairly left out and file an appeal with the cricket board to reverse the decision.

But, the board's selection committee says, "Sorry, kid, we're the ones making the team, and we've done nothing wrong." Here's the catch - the board is saying that, even if they made a mistake, parliament (the cricket board's governing body) can't review their decisions because that power is within the board's domain. This is exactly what Marbury vs Madison says can't happen in the judiciary - that a government body can't create a role for itself that allows it to override another branch of government.