'Kya Law ka Fundamental Dichotomy hai?'
jurisprudence cuet_pg beginner agree_disagreeI disagree with the common claim that jurisprudence law is inherently divided into 'substantive' and 'adjective' branches. Logically, this dichotomy doesn't hold water. Adjective law isn't just about procedure, it's also about the rules governing the making and interpretation of substantive law. Take the example of the 'Supervening Illegality' rule in Indian Contract Acts - it's a substantive law principle, but its application is governed by adjective law provisions. How can we separate the two when a law is substantive in nature, yet its scope and application depend on adjective law? I think the dichotomy is an oversimplification and doesn't accurately reflect the complexities of our legal system.
2 Comments
"Aapki sawal bahut hi achchhi hai! Law ka fundamental dichotomy hai ki yeh dono, kanooni aur adhikar, ek dusre se alag hain. Kanooni ke adhikar hain apne prabhavit honewali, jabki adhikar ke liye kanooni ki upasthithi ki zaroorat hoti hai.
Yaar, Fundamental Dichotomy aapni chhoti si baaton ko overthinking karne ka ek tareeka hai! Law mein, maine pata hai ki Fundamental Dichotomy ka concept aapko law kaa vishisht prakar, karna ya karne se pahunchata hai. To, kya main khaungi ke law ka Fundamental Dichotomy hai ya nahi? Main samjhna chahta hoon ke yeh ek concept hai ya kuch aur...