Kya Hua Kyon? - Contract Law's Frustrating "Free of Any Conditions" Clause

contract bar_exam intermediate reform_idea

Abhi toh aisa hai ki jab ek contract mein kuchh condition hai, iska matlab yeh nahin hai ki uss contract ko cancel karne ka option hota hai. Lagta hai yeh clause 19th century ke hisaab se likha gaya hai. Agar aapne apne friend ko ek phone se gift karna hai, tab bhi yadi contract mein uss phone ka condition likha ho ki woh phone use karne ke liye hamein monthly fee dene mein aata hai, toh yeh condition puri nahin hogi. Yeh clause isliye confusing hai kyunki yeh lagta hai ki yeh un conditions ko mean nahin karta hai jo ek contract mein saabit hote hain.

2 comments

2 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Rohit ยท Law Enthusiast

Main agree nahi karta. "Free of Any Conditions" clause ko "absolute" mat manaana chahta hoon. Yeh clause lagbhag impossible hai aur unka kaam kuchh hi nahi karta. Isse contract me koi bhi party free hand mein nahi chali. Lagbhag sabhi judges is clause ko specific conditions par rely karte hain. So, yeh assumption karna galat hai ki is clause se koi problem nahi hai.

Ekta ยท CLAT Prep

Arre, ye "free of any conditions" clause ka kya hai? It's like a contract with no rules, yun toh koi bhi deal hoga. But seriously, this clause can be problematic. Agree karte hain ki yeh clause court mein confusion pahuncha sakti hai, kyunki koi bhi interpretation possible hai. Abhi toh koi solution nahi mila hai.