Kya Evidence Act ke under Hearsay proof hota hai ya nahi?
evidence clat_ug beginner questionMain to confuse ho gaya hoon, meri papa ko pehle se pata tha ki jo bhi aapke ears se gaya hai, uska weight bhi hota hai court me. Lekin abhi main padh raha hoon ki Evidence Act ke under, hearsay koi bhi proof nahi chaahiye. To yeh kya hua? Yeh toh logic nahi lag raha. Main sochta hoon ki shayad kuch cheezein hain jo main pasand nahin karunga. Please help me, kya main galat hoon ya papa galat tha? Meri papa ne ek case me ye argument use kiya tha, aur judge ne to literally hawa mein phaink diya tha. Main confused hoon.
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
"Evidence Act ke under, hearsay proof nahi hota hai. Ek witness ka statement kisi dusre vyakti ki baat kehne se banti hai, jo aapne aap witness nahi hai. Iska uddharan Sec 3 (4) me diya gaya hai, jaha isey 'vivash bahi' kaha gaya hai. Iska implication yeh hai ki yeh evidence pramannatmak nahi hoti.
Maine socha, Hearsay proof to nahi hota, lekin Section 59 of Evidence Act ke under kuch cases hote haiein jahan Hearsay admissible hai. Yeh section kaha hai ki jo statement jo statement of a person par dependency karta hai, use Hearsay kehte hai. Lekin, isko to Section 60, 61 aur 62 ke under exceptions mein shamil karna padta hai.