Kant vs. Austin - Mein Samjh Nahin Aaya!!!
jurisprudence du_llb advanced comparisonDosto, please koi batao, dono jurisprudence ke concepts mein kya difference hai. Maine ye padha hai, lekin abhi bhi samajh nahi aaya. Kant ke Natural Law mein kya vishesh hai jo Austin ke Positive Law se alag hai. Kant kehate hain ki law ko morality se juda hona chahiye, lekin Austin kehate hain ki law ki definition hum hi lagate hain. Dono mein kya fark hai exactly? Maine ye question 3 baar padha aur abhi bhi samajh nahi aaya. Please help, DU LLB Entrance ke liye kuch clarification chahiye.
3 Comments
Bro, main bhi samjha nahin aaya thoda sa hai, but I think Kant's noumenal realm vs Austin's performative speech acts is like comparing apples and oranges. Kant's metaphysics is all about the moral law, while Austin's linguistic philosophy deals with how we use language to perform actions. Maybe we need to look at them from a different angle, yaar?
Koi problem nahin, mein try karoonga dekhna. Kant aur Austin dono ke views bahut aise hain, lekin unka focus kuch alag-alag hai. Kant moral law par focus karta hai, jo humare actions ka hisaab karta hai. Austin ke views se, law aur facts dono ek jaisa hai, aur law ko justicia ki duniya mein samajhna chahte hain. Sab se pehle dekhna hoga unke views kis tarah se related hain.
Bhai, aapko lagta hai vah ek kaafi jatil debate hai kya? Main bhi pehle jaise hi aap, mein bhi hamesha confused rehta tha. Lekin ek din, maine iska ek formula seekha - "Austin ke liye Crime hai action, aur Kant ke liye Crime hai niyam"! Aapko lagta hai yeh formula aapki samasya ka samadhan hai kya?