IPC vs Abetment: A Grey Area?
criminal judiciary intermediate mcq_debateMaine apne dost se ek ques discuss kiya jab wo yeh kheench raha tha ki IPC Section 107 Abetment wali hain aur woh yeh samajh gaye ki Section 106 bhi Abetment mein hain. Lekin main kuchh dhoukhdaar hun ke unka explanation kuchh sahi nahi hai.
Unhone kaha ki Section 107 mein "abettor" ka definition hai, jiska arth hai ki yeh wala jo koi crime karwaye. Aur unhone kaha ki Section 106 bhi yehi hai, kyonki yeh bhi Abetment ka case hai, jab koi aapko abettor banaye rakh raha hai koi crime karne ke liye.
3 comments
3 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Arre bhai, don't get too worried about this grey area. IPC and abetment kahaani hai bahut complex, but it's not impossible to crack. Jaise koi bhi section, focus karke padh sakte hain. Abetment kaa definition clear hai, lekin uska application complex hai. Just remember, abetment means aiding, abetting, or inciting, aur focus karke is concept ko samajhna, main mudda hal ho jayega.
To add another layer, IPC section 107 talks about criminal liability of abetment, where the abettor isn't present at the scene. Section 108 deals with abetment if the person who abetted knows or has reason to believe the act would be done in India. However, in the grey area of section 109, the abettor isn't liable if the person doing the act had no knowledge of the abetment. Koi confusion hai, but it's essential to understand these provisions.
Main nahin samjhta yeh grey area kya hai. IPC mein abetment ka khulasa hai, kisi dusre ko karna mana hai jo apna karna nahin karta. Jo log abetment ka dhyaan nahin dete, voh samajhmat hai ki woh kisi aur ki zindagi ko aadha saal pehle hi maar sakta tha. Abetment ka koi grey area nahin hai, yeh toh ek barabar ka dand hai.