IP ka khaos: Distinguishing between Exhaustion of Rights and Obligation of Good Faith Purchaser
ipr judiciary advanced questionMain kya samajh nahin pa raha hoon ki kya difference hota hai exhaustioin of rights (Section 29 of Trade Marks Act) aur obligation of good faith purchaser (Section 34 of Trade Marks Act) ke beech?? Toh kya yeh dono hi wahi cheez nahin hain?? Mere coaching mein isse pehle se hi samjhaya gaya tha, par ab maine court ka judgment padha hai aur main confuse ho gaya hoon.
Udaaharan tak, Supreme Court ka judgment hai Shree Vani Institute vs. Anand India (2013) 4 SCC 190. Yeh case hai trade mark infringement ka aur Supreme Court ne section 34 ka use kya hai?
2 Comments
Bhai, yeh topic bahut zada complex hai. But don't worry, main aapki madad karunga. Exhaustion of Rights aur Obligation of Good Faith Purchaser ko distinguish karne ka secret yeh hai ki pahle ke case mein, hakdaar ka right exhausted ho jata hai, jabki dusre mein, kram-shikshak (prior user) ka right protected rahata hai.
IP ka khaos, woh hai baat! Jab ek creator ki IP rights khatam ho jati hain, toh woh exhaustion of rights kehte hain. Lekin, agar koi person IP ke baare mein galati se jaankaari rakhta hai, toh good faith purchaser ke liye kya hoga? Woh toh naa to khatarnaak hai, naa hi unka dilchasp karyakram. Yeh point of law hai ki unhe kya karna chahiye?