Harshad v/s Chandra Kant - Contract Formation Confusion ๐Ÿค”

cpc ap_lawcet beginner question

Kya karta hai yeh difference CPC me? Maine socha tha Contract banane ke liye only free acceptance aur consideration dene ki zaroorat hoti hai, lekin phir ye question aaya - Harshad v/s Chandra Kant ka case hai jahaan court ne likha hai ki contract khatam ho jata hai jab acceptor acceptance deta hai, lekin baad mein wo reject karta hai. Kya yeh bhi Contract formation ke liye ek condition hai? Maine socha tha only initial agreement hai to khaad se kya relation hai acceptace aur consideration ke? Kuch confuse ho rha hoon. Plz explain.

1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Kunal ยท Legal Researcher

Bhai, calm down! Formaation of contract ke baare mein confusion to hoti hai. Harshad v/s Chandra Kant dono ke case mein, contract formation ke liye offer aur acceptance ka presence zaroori hai. Lekin, Chandra Kant ka case isliye zyada famous hai kyunki wahaan offeree ne offer ko accept bina specific acceptance ke kary kar diya tha. Thoda thoda, aapko clear hoga! ๐Ÿ“š