Gajraj v. The State of M.P: Unconscionability Test in Consumer Contracts

Bhai yaar, do you think it's fair to test unconscionability in consumer contracts based solely on the disparity in bargaining power? I don't think so. In Gajraj, the Supreme Court applied the unconscionability test to a contract between a consumer and a trader, but it relied heavily on the disparity in bargaining power. This approach is flawed, bhai. It's too simplistic and doesn't consider the complexities of consumer markets. What if the consumer is an informed one, who knows exactly what they're getting into? Should they be at a disadvantage just because they're not as powerful as the trader? Tell me, how would you approach this issue?