Frustration Begone, Concept Clarity Achieved
contract mh_cet_law intermediate success_shareYay, finally cracked it - the Doctrine of Frustration! Knew about it, had read about it, but couldn't quite understand how it applies to contracts, especially where a contract is frustrated due to a supervening event. Was re-reading Justice K. K. Mathew's judgment in 'Cheltenham & Gloucester Plc v. Apex Redemption Ltd' (1989) 3 LLR 1 when it hit me - a contract can be frustrated only if the supervening event makes the contract impossible to perform, not just difficult. That tiny clarity led to a solid attempt in the MH CET Law exam, and I'm hoping it shows in my scorecard. Feeling much more confident now!
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Bhai, I think I understand the concept of frustration. It's a doctrine of law that says if a contract becomes impossible to perform due to unforeseen circumstances, the contract stands terminated. For example, if I sign a contract with a restaurant to serve food on a specific date but a cyclone destroys the kitchen, the contract is frustrated and can be cancelled. Now, let's see some case laws on this, shall we?
Yaar, maine paya hai ki confusion baaki hai. Sabhi ke liye clarify karna hai, "Frustration Begone" ka concept to property law me aata hai. Ismein contract ki sharton ka break ho jata hai, jab 3 saalon se adhik samay badle to contract toot jata hai. Iski koi vajah ni, jaise ki lagat, samasya ya koi aur.