Excluding Unverified Hearsay Under the Evidence Act 1872

I'm still baffled by Section 6 of the Evidence Act, which lets hearsay testimony be considered admissible in court if the court thinks the deponent would have told the person who recorded the statement the truth. What even is that? In 2025, we have digital recordings, videos, and emails. Why are we still stuck with the 'probable source' rule? This provision makes no sense in today's world. The burden of proof is already on the prosecution; why add another layer of uncertainty? It's time to bring the Evidence Act 1872 in line with the times.