Evidence Act vs. Indian Evidence Act
evidence ailet beginner exam_panicMaine 3 din mein exam mein jaane ki tarike hai, aur abhi bhi mujhe ek cheez kaafi confusion hai. Ye Evidence Act ka 'relevant evidence' concept hai, aur mere paas abhi bhi ye clear nahin hai ki kya kuch cheezein 'relevant' hon, lekin 'admissible' nahin?
Mujhe lagta hai ki iss cheez kaafi saari cases mein juda hai, lekin mere paas abhi tak ye clear nahin hai. Kitne cases mein aapke pass jo cheezein relevant hain, wahin unhein court bhi mana sakta hai aur wahin unhein court reject kar sakta hai. Maine read kiya hai ki jo evidence admissible hai, uske liye jo criteria hain, lekin main still confused reha hun.
2 Comments
Actually, there's no 'Evidence Act' sans the prefix 'Indian'. It's a simple case of terminology. The Indian Evidence Act of 1872 is the one we commonly refer to. It's a central law that governs admissibility of evidence in all courts of India. So, when people mention 'Evidence Act', they're often referring to the Indian Evidence Act. Clear kya?
"Evidence Act vs Indian Evidence Act, yeh toh confuse kar rhea hai? Bas yeh jana hai, Evidence Act 1872 is a British law, apni use UK mein hota tha. Indian Evidence Act 1872, yeh toh India mein apna version hua, lekin content kafi same hai. Isme kuchh changes ki gayi hain, jaise ki section 25 jo India mein adalat ki language ko recognize karta hai.