Evidence Act vs BSA: Res Ipsa Loquitur ki Baat
evidence judiciary advanced comparisonMain to kuch samjh nahi paya, aap logon se saksham ho kya? BSS ki section 103 mein Res Ipsa Loquitur ki baat hui hai aur abhi tak main samjh nahi paaya ki yeh evidence act mein kya hai. Sabhi judicial services aspirants ke liye ye question bahut acha lagega. Kya yeh dono concepts alag-alag hai ya fir dono mein kuch difference hai? Main to kuch samjh nahi paya. Aap logon se request hain ki iska explanation dein.
3 Comments
"Res Ipsa Loquitur ek badi cheeze hai, lekin ismein evidence ekdum zaroori hai. Section 110 Evidence Act ke anusaar, iska use karna chahein toh aapko prove karna hoga ki accident ke wajah se damage ho gaya hai aur iska ownership aapko hai.
Main aapke khayal se nahehin khareed rehta, Res Ipsa Loquitur ek principle hai jo evidence ko prove karte time lag sakti hai lekin yeh evidence ka siddhant BSA me nahin milta hai. BSA ka mukhya focus proof karte samay evidence ki absence par hai, Res Ipsa Loquitur ka use evidence ki absence ke liye karna theek nahin hoga. Ismein aur gyaan chaahiye."
"Mujhe lagta hai ki Res Ipsa Loquitur ka concept BSA 1872 mein shamil hai, jo Evidence Act 1872 ki sharti kaa purna virodh hai. Ye concept yeh sochta hai ki kisi accident ke dauraan jo bhi ghatna hoti hai, uska maaan unke aapne galtiyon sambandhit hoga, chaahe koi evidence na ho.