Evidence Act vs BSA: My General Law Meltdown
evidence general intermediate failure_storyMaine socha tha ki Evidence Act aur BSA ekdum smooth hoga, lekin bas yahaan dekho, abhi tak koi samjh nahin aaya. Maine 3 saalo se study kiya hai, phir bhi koi clear understanding nahin. Maine yeh samjha tha ki Evidence Act ke under, admissible evidence ka concept hoga, aur BSA mein witnesses aur statements ka role hoga, lekin jab tak kuch samjhne ke liye practical examples nahin aaye, tab tak samjha nahin aaya.
Ab maine strategy change ki hai, kuch practical examples aur case laws launga, aur phir hi aasaan hoga.
2 Comments
Arre yaar, I don't think Evidence Act aur BSA don't clash. BSA is more about burden of proof, whereas Evidence Act deals with the kinds of evidence admissible in court. They are complementary, not contradictory. BSA says how you prove a thing, aur Evidence Act says what kind of evidence you can use for that proof. Don't think it's a meltdown, ek sahi vichaar hai.
"Main aapko agree nahi karta ki Evidence Act aur BSA ka comparison humare general law course mein ek meltdown hai. Bahut saari times, Evidence Act ko civil law aur BSA ko penal law ka hisa maana jaata hai. Agar aapke teacher ne BSA ko general law mein shaamil kiya hai, toh aisa ho sakta hai ki aapko confusion hogi.