Evidence Act v/s BSA: Jodidar's Dilemma

Yaar samajh nahi aaya, please help. In Judicial Services exam, I'm struggling with a question on Section 32 of Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 92A of BSA ( Bombay Shops & Establishments Act) 1958. Both sections deal with 'previous good character' of the accused as a relevant fact. But how can two different pieces of legislation have the same concept yet be treated differently in court? If a person has a clean record in one context (Section 32 Evidence Act), does that automatically make it a relevant fact in another context (Section 92A BSA)? It's like, jodida hai yeh sab, lekin kaise apply karna hai, nahi pata. Please help, koi to explanation dene ki jaroorat nahi hai, bas samjhaane ki zaroorat hai.