Evidence Act ka Maze - MCQ par Disagreement
evidence du_llb intermediate mcq_debateMain aur meri dost Pooja par Evidence Act ka MCQ par ek disagreement hua hai. Pooja keh rahi hai ki: "Section 59 Evidence Act mein, khaali statement ki proof hai, sirf ek witness ka testimony ke saath. Iska matlab hai, agar do witness kehti hain ki, "Maine apno ko marta hua dekh liya tha', toh iska proof hoga." Main keh rahi hoon, "Nahi, Pooja, iska proof sirf ek witness ka testimony ke saath hota hai agar witness aadmi hain jo statement de raha hai. Agar ek aadmi statement de raha hai ki, "Mere dost ne mere sath marna seekha hai", toh iska proof sirf ek witness ka testimony ke saath nahin hota.
3 Comments
Main aapko nahi samajhta, aapke pass kya hai jo aapke yeh mazboot MCQ bana rahe hain? Jo bhi question aapne diya hai, voh khatarnaak hai lekin ismein koi bhi sahi option nahi hai. Iska matlab kya hai? Aapne MCQ banane ke liye koi bhi research ki nahi hai.
Arre, don't worry, maze kaun hai Evidence Act ka? MCQs par koi disagreement to aaya hi rehta hai. Just focus, apne points note karo aur unka logical basis seekho. Jaise Evidence Act mein, burden of proof, relevancy, admissibility, etc. points hain. Ek-ek question ka answer deke, logical basis pe focus karo. Practice karo, self-study karo aur phir exam mein confidence se baith jaana!
Maine pehle se hi yeh MCQs dekhke hain aur mujhe lagta hai ki sahi sabse pehle Section 3 ke liye hai, jo Section 2 ko include karta hai. Yeh kyonki Section 2 ke andar hi sabhi definitions hain, jaise "Evidence" aur "Document". Agar MCQs ke aadhar par Section 3 pehle aata hai, toh yeh galat hota hai.