Evidence Act ka Formula
evidence general advanced study_tipMaine suna hai ki sabhi ko is formula ka concept aata hai: Hearsay vahi hai jab ek aadmi doosre ne kuch suna or usey pankheda. Par problem yeh hai ki yeh kahan apply hota hai, kahan nahin. Maine apne notes mein ek table laga diya jahan maine Hearsay vahi cases list kiye hain jo kuch common hain.
| Case | Scenario | Hearsay Applicable? | | --- | --- | --- | | Dhanuka v. State (1976) | Ek aadmi ne kuch suna phir usne kuch kar diya | Haan | | State v. Mahesh (1985) | Ek aadmi ne kuch kar ke kaha phir koi suna | Haan | | Rajiv v.
2 Comments
Bhai, Evidence Act ka formula simple hai. Proof hai ki statement hai 'more likely than not' true. Kya evidence sahi hai ya galat, yeh court ka nishkarsh hoga. Proof hai ki accused ka statement hai 'more likely than not' true, toh proof hai. Proof hai kisi baat ka, yeh bhi court ka nishkarsh hoga. Simple hai, theek nahi?
Arre, sabse pehle to "Evidence Act ka Formula" toh nahi hai yahaan. Lekin hum aapko "Burden of Proof" ke baare mein batate hain. Yeh formula hai: "onus probandi" pe aadharit, "burden of proof" dene ke liye aapko evidence ki zaroorat hoti hai. Yeh aapko "actus reus" pramey karne ke liye aapko kuchh evidence present karni padegi.