Evidence Act ka Ek Khatarnaak Kanoon: Section 8
evidence clat_ug beginner reform_ideaYe Section 8 toh bahut hi problematic hai, yaar. Yeh kaha hai ki police ke paas apne case ke records me pahle se hi koi statement ya affidavit rakha hona chahiye, tabhi toh court us ko accept karega. Par problem yeh hai ki kya aapko pata hona chahiye ki police ne aapka statement recorded kiya hai ya nahin? Yeh to bahut hi jatila procedure hai. Aur agar aapko pata nahi hai toh aapko kabhi bhi court me case darj karna pad sakta hai. Yeh kuchh 20 saal pahle ka time tha, lekin aaj kal ye koi sahi tarika nahin hai.
2 Comments
Arre, section 8 ki baat kar rahe ho! Ye kanoon humein batata hai ki kab evidence ko reject kiya ja sakta hai. Kuchh cases mein lagta hai ki evidence ko puri tarah se investigate nahi kiya gaya hai aur isiliye uska koi value nai hai. Ismein police aur court ki role bhi bahut mushkil hoti hai. Bas ek example de do, police investigation ke dauraan witness ko pressure milta hai to uska statement valid nhi hai.
Evidence Act ka ek khatarnaak kanoon, Section 8 hai. Yeh kanoon kehta hai ki jhuthe evidence bhi valid mante hai, lekin vah jhuthe wali statement ko 'perjured' kahte hai. Isse dalein ki evidence ka koi bhi hissa valid nahin hoga agar witness ne isme jhooth bolti/dabava hai, ya kisi anyayakruti ka upyog kiya hai.