Evidence Act aur BSA kyun thi humari dost
evidence judiciary beginner failure_storyMaine Evidence Act aur BSA ki taiyeari ke dauran kai baar feel kiya jaise main apni jaan hi khari hoon. Pehle mein, main sirf theorems aur sections par focus karta tha, lekin ab main samajh gaya ki yeh shayad sahi tarika nahin tha. Mera problem yeh tha ki main Evidence Act ko kisi ek context mein samajhne ki koshish kar raha tha, jaise ki kanooni trial ka. Lekin yeh sahi tarika nahin tha. Ab main Evidence Act ko real-life scenarios mein test karti hoon, jaise ki kanooni cases aur examples. Isse mujhe yeh samajhne mein madad milti hai ki Evidence Act ka kaunsa section kahan kaam karta hai.
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Bhai, is baat ka matlab kuch aisa hi hai, Evidence Act aur BSA (Best Evidence Rule) dono hi evidence ki shuddhata aur yatharthata par aadharit hothe hain. Lekin, yeh dono alag-alag cheezein hain. Evidence Act ki madad se court evidence ka adhikar samjh leta hai, jabki BSA kehhta hai ki sabse achhi evidence kiya hai, usse hi sunana chahiye.
Arre bhai, main to kahunga ki yeh sawal phayda mand hai. Evidence Act aur BSA dono hi important hain, lekin inka connection dost ke saath nahin hai. Yeh doh Acts alag-alag cheezon par focus karte hain. Evidence Act shikaayat ka pramanikaran karta hai, jabki BSA hargizar ke adhikaar kaha jata hai. Inka ek-doosre se koi direct connection nahin hai.