Doubt - Realism vs Nominalism in Jurisprudence
jurisprudence judiciary advanced doubtYaar samajh nahi aaya, maine ye concept 3 baar padha aur abhi bhi samajh nahi aaya. Inke beech difference kya hai? Nominalism ke mutabiq laws mere brain mein bas ek concept hai jiski reality khatam ho jati hai. Lekin realism ke anusaar laws khud hi ek reality hai. Iske baare mein main confuse hua. Kya aapke according to realism laws ko reality me apply karna hai ya laws ke bare mein socha jata hai. Please help, main Judicial services ke liye pad raha hoon aur is concept ko samajhna bahut jarrat hai.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Dosto, yaar, let's clarify this concept. Realism (kala realism) vs Nominalism (kala nominalism) in jurisprudence - it's not about the physical existence or not. Realism (kala) says law is an independent reality, whereas Nominalism says law is just a label (nominality) or a social construct. So, kala realism sees law as an objective, while nominalism sees it as a subjective interpretation.