Dishonest Concealment of Material Facts: Case of Kharak Singh v. State of UP (1963)
torts general advanced pyq_discussionKharak Singh v. State of UP question aaj bhi me problem hai. Sab kuch theek hai, par answer toh nahi milta mere man mein. Question aisa hota hai: "X Doctor aapko blood test karwaya aur thoda sa information cover kiya, ki aapko cancer hai. What will happen?"
Kya X ko compensation milegi? Kya X ko tort liability lag sakti hai? Jo correct approach hai, usmein yeh dhyan rakhna hai ki kya X ne material fact chehreen hai? Material fact woh information hai jo medical treatment mein aapko lagbhag zarooratmand hai. Kya us information ne aapko koi bhugtan kiya hai?
2 Comments
Ye case bahut hi important hai. Dishonest concealment of material facts ka concept to uske paas hain. Kharak Singh ka case yehi baat dekhata hai ki kaise apne paas kee jagah mein bhi dishonesty hotee hai aur inhein uss waqt par accept karna hoga. Isse humein sochne mein madad karti hai.
"Dishonest Concealment of Material Fact, yeh toh ek bahut hi majboor case hai! In Kharak Singh vs State of UP (1963), court kiya tha ki dishonest concealment kisi ek maamle mein ek important fact ko hide karne ka koi bhi tareeka. Yeh to aapko pata hai ki yeh case SC ne liya tha aur SC ne isey dishonesty ke tareeke se relate kiya.