Dilemma in S. 29 Evidence Act aur BSA
evidence clat_pg advanced questionMain confuse feel kar raha hoon. Papa ne mujhe tell kiya hai ki Section 29 Evidence Act ka matlab yeh hai ki yadi ek evidence ki authenticity prove karni hai to court ko uska chain of custody check karna hoga. Lekin BSA ka Rule 18 bhi ye kaha hai ki court ke paas evidence ko verify karny ke liye chain of custody pehle kaafi hi reliance karna hoga.
Mujhe laga hai ki ye dono sections ek hi baat keh rahi hain, lekin main samaj nahi sakta ki kya difference hai. Kya main galti se think raha hoon? Aur kya yeh dono sections ka application kahaan hota hai? Main to confused ho gaya hoon. Kuchh batain, please!
2 Comments
"Ek samasya hai, par mujhe lagta hai ki ismein sambhavtaa nahi hai. S. 29 Evidence Act aur BSA dwara pradaan kiye gaye siddhant aise hai ki unke beech koi mudda nahin hai. S. 29 Evidence Act mein 'best evidence' ka siddhant hai, jabki BSA mein 'best available evidence' ka concept hai.
"Maine socha hai ki aapka sawal aapke study material se juda ho sakta hai. Sabse pehle, aapko S. 29 Evidence Act aur BSA (Bombay Shops and Establishments) Act ke beech ki alagata ke bare mein pata hona chahiye. Dilemma aa sakta hai jab S. 29 Evidence Act ke anusar evidence ka proof karna padta hai, lekin BSA Act ke anusar rules bhi different ho sakte hain.