Cyberlaw Conundrum - Hacking vs Cyber Terrorism
cyber judiciary advanced doubtYaar samajh nahi aaya, please help. I'm stuck on Section 66F and Section 66A of IT Act. Both deal with hacking, but somehow my mind keeps confusing them. I know S.66F is about hacking with or without permission, but then what's the difference between this and cyber terrorism under S. 66 (1)(d)? Isn't hacking with malicious intent (S. 66F) same as causing death or grievous hurt (S. 66) which is again same as cyber terrorism (S. 66F not, but S. 66 is related to the act and has an element of physical harm, and yet S. 66F does too - with the difference that this is intangible). How do I differentiate between these two in a judicial test? Help, please?
2 Comments
Mehengai hai, cyberlaw ke baad mein bhi hacking aur cyber terrorism ko judge karna mudda hai. Hacking to personal crime hai, lekin cyberterrorism national security ki issue hai. Abhi kuch countries cyberterrorism ko 'severe threat' keh rahe hain. Lekin hacking ko cybercrime hi banaya ja raha hai. Different approach ki zaroorat hai!
Bhai, yeh hai ek bahut hi jatil vishay. Hacking aur cyber terrorism ke beech antar nahi is prakar ka nahi hota ki hacking kisi ko nuksan pehchaane ka aadhar hota hai, lekin cyber terrorism hai iski ek adhik vastavik vartmaan avadhi, jahaan hamare desh aur anya desh hamaare computer aur online systems ke madhyam se attack kiye jaate hain.