CPC Tricky 1: K.L. Sharma v. Ram Lal
cpc clat_ug advanced pyq_discussion"Maine ye question 3 baar padha aur abhi bhi samajh nahi aaya 😭. CLAT UG 2020 mein yeh question aya tha. 'A' ne 50,000 ka kharcha kya karke 'B' ko apni property transfer kardi, to 'B' ko kya hoga? Aap ko yeh decide karna hai ki yeh transfer valid hai ya nahi."
"Ab, samajhne ke liye, humein remember karna hai ki transfer valid hoti hai ki nahi, woh CPC 157 par depend karta hai. Lekin woh condition hai, agar transfer karke 'B' ne apni liability ko decrease kiya aur koi other intention nahin thi, toh yeh transfer valid hoga.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Yeh case bahut tricky hai! 'K.L. Sharma v. Ram Lal' mein, Apex Court ne kaha ki CPC ke Sec 96 ke under, koi bhi party kanooni karkhanaal ko koi bhi tarah ka adhikar nahi deti. Is case mein, High Court ne Ram Lal ko kanooni adhikar diya, lekin Supreme Court ne isko reject kar diya aur kaha ki High Court ka faisla galat tha.