CPC Section 102: Presumption of Continuance of Corporate Existence

cpc judiciary intermediate discussion

Alright guys, today we're going to crush this question. CPC, remember? So, under CPC Section 102, if a notice is sent to a company and the company does not respond, it is presumed that the company has received the notice and that it has a managing agent to act on its behalf. Now, here's the thing: can a company's inactivity or silence imply acceptance of the fact that it has a managing agent who can act on its behalf?

I'm taking the side that says no, the mere silence or inactivity of a company cannot imply acceptance. It's like, you can't assume someone's acceptance just because they didn't respond. You need explicit consent or clear action, like filing an affidavit. What do you guys think? Can a company's silence really imply acceptance?

0 comments

0 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.