Courtroom Chaos: Natives vs Non-Natives in Trespass

So I was observing a case in the HC where a foreigner was suing a local hotel for trespass. Textbook says trespass is about entering someone's property without permission. But Papa ne mujhe bola, "Beta, law is not just about what's written, it's about how it's applied." In this case, the judge accepted that the foreigner didn't intend to trespass, but since he didn't have permission, it's still trespass. But the twist was that the hotel had specifically marketed themselves as tourist-friendly, so they couldn't claim ignorance. Papa said it's a classic example of Vicarious Liability, where a business is held responsible for their employees' actions. Judge finally ruled in favor of the foreigner, saying the hotel should've been more careful. It was a small case, but it showed me how torts law can get messy in real life.