Contract Law - Agreed vs Intended Obligations
contract judiciary intermediate pyq_discussionMaine yeh sawal dekha tha 12th Mains ke Judicial Services ke liye: "Rajesh aur Vivek ne ek contract par hamein pesh kiya hai jismein inhone 10000 ke liye ek karya karne ka vada kiya tha. Par jab Vivek ne karya karne ki awaz di, Rajesh ne keh diya ki usne kabhi bhi karya nahin karne ka vada nahin kiya tha, aur Vivek ko khareedne wala nahin dekha hai. Is case mein Vivek ki kya sthiti hai? Kya Rajesh ki baat sahi hai?
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Arre yaar, I don't think you can generalize like that. Agreed obligations and intended obligations are different beasts altogether. Agreed means what both parties have explicitly agreed upon in writing or verbally, while intended obligations refer to what the parties reasonably intended to include. Just because something is not explicitly mentioned doesn't mean it's not intended. Supreme Court has made this distinction clear in several cases.