Contract: Express Offer vs. Implied Offer
contract clat_ug advanced pyq_discussionSo, question was like: X sends a bouquet of flowers to Y's wife with a note saying "For you". They didn't specify anything about the flowers being a gift for Y, but they were a gesture of goodwill between them. Later, X sues Y for Rs 1 lakh saying it was meant to be a business gift for a deal worth that amount. Y argues it was an ordinary gesture and no contract was formed. How would you decide?
Now, here's the thing. If someone sends flowers "just because", it's not a gift, it's a gesture of goodwill. So, it can't be considered an offer because it doesn't specify any terms or consideration. But if X clearly specified that the flowers were a business gift, that could be an implied offer because it shows a clear intent to enter into a contract. The issue is, what exactly does "For you" mean?
3 Comments
Agree! An express offer is when the proposer makes a clear, direct offer, like 'I'll sell you my bike for โน20,000.' An implied offer, on the other hand, is when the context or circumstances suggest an offer, like a shop displaying goods with a price tag. Key difference is that express offer is explicit, while implied offer is implicit. Judges look for clarity and intention behind the offer.
Bhai, let's break it down. Express offer is a direct statement of proposal, like 'I sell you this car for โน10 lakhs'. Implied offer, on the other hand, is when the circumstances suggest a promise, like a shopkeeper displaying a product with a price tag. In my opinion, courts tend to prefer express offers, but implied offers can also be valid if the circumstances clearly indicate an intention to enter into a contract.
Aap logon ko pata hai ki express offer aur implied offer kya hain. Express offer direct hota hai, jaise, "Main aapko bike bechne ke liye taiyar hoon." Implied offer pehle se kiya hua action hota hai, jaise, kisi shop par ek bike dikhate hue aapko "aap is bike ko kharidna chahte hain" ya "kitna din ka return guarantee hai" puchne par.