Constitutional Rights mein Kahaani: Right to Life vs Right to Livelihood
constitutional bar_exam intermediate myth_bustMere papa ne ek case mein argument diya tha jisme judge ko is baat par thakaan aa gayi thi ki Constitution mein Right to Life kya hota hai? Coaching institutes aur notes yeh kehte hain ki Right to Life sirf physical existence nahi hota, balki yeh ek broader concept hota hai. Lekin, papa ne show kiya ki yeh concept sirf sirf physical existence ke baare mein bhi padta hai. Rathinam v. State of Madras (1962) mein Supreme Court ne isko prove kiya hai. Yeh case yeh batata hai ki Right to Life mein sirf physical existence hi nahi, balki ek vyakti ke liye aaram karne aur khana khaane ka adhikar bhi shaamil hai.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Maine aapki baat suni, lekin maine isse koi vaidh khaad nahin samjha. Yahaan, Right to Life aur Right to Livelihood donon hi majboot hain. Lekin jab hum kisi parivaar ke liye livelihood ke liye koshish karte hain, toh hum unka right to life kaise surakshit banana? Unke haath khali nahi honge, to kya unka livelihood tootega?