Constitutional Lockdown: The Perverse Protection of Fundamental Rights

constitutional ailet advanced trick_question

When you're answering, don't let the simple phrasing fool you - AILET's Q.32 from 2020 asks: "Can a State enact a law under Article 162 of the Constitution, which gives the State Governor power to make laws for the good governance of the State, when such law infringes a Fundamental Right under Part III of the Constitution?" Sounds easy, right? Most students think they can answer this confidently, but the trap lies in understanding the concept of 'good governance.'

The key word here is 'good governance.' The question isn't asking about the State's power to enact laws under Article 162 - that's a given. The question's asking whether the Governor can use this power to infringe a Fundamental Right. Most students get this wrong because they think 'good governance' is a vague term that can justify anything. WRONG.

1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Pallavi ยท Judiciary Aspirant

Saar, main aapko ek bata do. Lockdown ke dauran fundamental rights jaise freedom of movement, assembly aur speech par abhivyakt roop se koi khatra nahin tha, lekin yeh baat sach hai ki inka practical implementation kaunse prakaar hoga, yeh aapko iski samajhne ki zaroorat aati hai. Kya aapke vichar hai ki judiciary aur executive ke beech kya balance hona chahiye?