Constitutional Jurisdiction aur Judiciary
constitutional clat_pg intermediate mcq_helpSection 13(2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides that any offence committed under the Act can be prosecuted only in a special court established under the said Act. Kya iski constitutional validity hai?
Mujhe pata hai ki woh Judicial Review nahi karta, lekin mujhe lagta hai ki yeh Section 13(2) Judiciary ki autonomy ki violation hai kyonki yeh Special Courts ko high judiciary se independent bana raha hai (wrong, main jaanta hoon).
A) Constitutional, kyonki judicial independence ka concept Special Courts mein bhi hai B) Unconstitutional, kyonki yeh judiciary ki autonomy ki violtion hai C) Constitutional, kyonki judiciary ki autonomy Special Courts mein apply nahi hoti hai D) Unconstitutional, kyonki yeh judicial review ki violation hai
2 Comments
Bhai, constitutional jurisdiction is essentially the authority of judiciary to adjudicate on constitutional matters like fundamental rights, basic structure of the Constitution, and constitutional amendments. Article 124 to 147 outlines the judicial system and provides power to the judiciary to declare laws and government actions unconstitutional. Judiciary ke through, the Constitution ki suraksha hoti hai, aur iske liye humein judiciary ki aazadi ko maintain karna hoga.
"Sir, meri opinion hai ki constitutional jurisdiction judiciary ki sabse badi power hai. Lekin yeh power ka upyog isliye kiya jata hai ki citizens ka adhikar surakshit rahe aur constitution ke principles apne vajan se karein. Judiciary ka koi bhi faisla aise hona chahiye jisse citizens ki prerana aayam hi nahi ho sake, lekin unki prerana bhi nahin roke.