Constitutional Conundrum: "Social Media Censorship by a Private Company

Let's say a social media platform owned by a private company in India starts censoring content that's critical of the government, effectively stifling free speech. What if this private company gets into an alliance with the government and starts blocking dissenting voices, and the government starts to exert pressure on the judiciary to allow this censorship?

Under article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, freedom of speech is an inherent right. But, article 19(2) allows the government to impose reasonable restrictions on this right. Does this private company's censorship fall under article 19(2), and if so, what constitutes a 'reasonable restriction'? Or does the government's pressure on the judiciary amount to an unconstitutional overreach, violating the doctrine of separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary?