Confusion with Section 29 of Evidence Act
evidence clat_ug beginner questionKya hai yeh Section 29? Maine suna hai ki ye hai related hua jo evidence ke proof ke liye. Lekin main samjha nahi aata ki yeh Section kya karta hai? Maine padha hai ki yeh Section khta hai ki jo koi person jo statement deta hai, uski identity nahi pehchani ja sakti hai. Lekin maine suna hai ki Court mein ek case thi jahaan judge ne statement ko proof ke liye accept kiya tha aur phir bhi uska witness ko identity pehchani ja sakti thi. Toh kya ye Section kehti hai ki statement ke liye koi identity nahi chahiye? Kya main samjh raha hoon? Kuch sahi examples de dena please.
2 Comments
Hey, don't worry, koi bhi problem hai Section 29 wala. Yeh to basic concept hai, jo kuchh confusion pehta hai. Section 29 ke under, jo testimony aata hai, uska adhaar ya evidence bhi karna padta hai. Agar aapki problem hai, toh kuchh examples le lo, aur see how they fit in Section 29 ke rules. Isse aapko clear picture dega, aur confusion door ho jayega. Try karo, aapka samadhan milega.
Main aapko samjhaana chaahta hoon ki Section 29 of Evidence Act mere liye bahut complex hai. Ye Section kya kehta hai ki aapke khud ke khilaaf kahaaniyan apnaane se bhi koi evidence nahin hoti. Lekin mere doston ne kiya hai ki ismein koi exception hai, koi special case. Main samajhta hoon, lekin aap kya keh rahe hain?