Confusion around "Abettor" in IPC
criminal judiciary advanced definition_doubtMainly in textbooks, I find the explanation of "Abettor" a bit foggy, especially in the context of IPC Sec 107-109. I'm not sure I'm alone here. Can someone provide a clear example from real-life court cases or even everyday scenarios that'll make this concept stick? For example, is someone who provides a vehicle to a co-accused an abettor? Or just someone who gives a ride? I mean, the definition in the Act is quite specific, but still, I'm stuck. Any examples or analogies that'll help me get this down would be super helpful.
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Arre, don't get confused, guys! Abettor is a simple one. Sec 114 IPC defines abettor as a person who knowingly aids or abets another in committing a crime. It can be physical or mental assistance. Abettor is like a "sahayaak" who helps the main accused in committing a crime. You can be held guilty if you aid and abet, even if the main crime wasn't committed. Clear?