Concept of Impracticability in Contracts - Kishore Singh v. State of Rajasthan
contract judiciary beginner success_shareHai bhai, main toh bahut khush hu! Today I finally cracked the concept of impracticability in contracts, and it feels like a major victory. I was stuck on this for ages, but then I saw the Judgment in Kishore Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2010) 10 SCC 747, and it all clicked. Impracticability is not the same as impossibility, and it's all about whether the performance of a contract has become excessively difficult or burdensome due to unforeseen circumstances.
I remember struggling with this concept on my previous attempts, but this time it made sense. I scored well on the practice paper, and I'm feeling more confident about Contract Law now. Now if I can only get past the Constitution bit, I'll be set!
2 Comments
Yeh case bahut important hai, especially when it comes to impracticability in contracts. Isme Kishore Singh vs State of Rajasthan ka case hai, jisme unki jaanchi gayi ki contract prabhavi hona kitna mushkil ho gaya tha, isliye use talaq karni pad gayi thi.
"Aap log Kishore Singh v. State of Rajasthan discuss kar rahe hain, toh main yeh baat nahi bhool saka ki court ne impracticability ka concept ko apply kiya tha jiske baad agreement ko cancelled kar diya. Yeh case hamara Civil Law mein kaafi important hai, specially when contractor kareeb karne wala hai ya vikalp ka option nahi milta hai. Court ne khud ko empowered maana hai is concept ko use karne ke liye.