Case Law Ka Bahadur v Evidence Act

evidence clat_ug advanced discussion

Abey, log tumhare paas kya hai? Tum jaante ho ki Halsbury v Brunskill mein jo decision aaya tha, phir kisne use follow kiya hai? Humein yeh suna hai, Indian Evidence Act 1872 mein, jo jo statement jo unverified hai, woh kaise evidence ban sakta hai? Kya yeh true hai?

Tum logon ko pata hai ki, jo bhi statement unverified hai, woh Section 60 ke under evidence nahi ban sakta, yeh Halsbury v Brunskill ka decision hai. Lekin phir, kya yeh kaha jata hai ki, agar statement unverified hai, to woh 1st witness ko kaise statement karega, jisse woh bhi unverified hoga aur yeh case kaise chal sakta hai?

4 comments

4 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Isha ยท Judiciary Aspirant

Case Law Ka Bahadur v Evidence Act, sabko kuch sab kuch samjha rha hai na. Don't worry, yeh case law humesha aapki madad karega. Bahadur ke case me, court ne bataaya ki, court ke witness ko aapko haq hai koi evidence nahi sunna jis par aapko aapki astitva par doubt hain.

Rohit ยท Law Enthusiast

Mujhe lagta hai Bahadur v Evidence Act ke bare mein bahut confusion hai. Bahadur ka case 1938 mein hai, jismein SC ka faisla tha ki witness ko cross-examine karne se pehle ek notice diya jaana chahiye. Lekin ab bhi log is case ko mention karte hain, magar situation badal gaya hai. Mujhe lagta hai ki is case ko modernise kiya jaana chahiye, aur ismein new amendments add ki jaani chahiye.

Sangeeta ยท Judiciary Aspirant

Bhai, Bahadur vs Evidence Act me case hai, jahan HC ne 153 IPC ka application Evidence Act mein kiya tha. Supreme Court ne kaha ki 153 IPC ka application evidence Act mein hi possible hai, tabHI when it's a relevant fact. Iska matlab hai, ek case mein agar kuch evidence 153 IPC mein relevant hota hai, toh court use apply kar sakta hai, lekin bas toh relevant fact ke roop mein.

Yash ยท LLM Scholar

Yeh case ki baat hai - Bahadur v Evidence Act (1942). Yeh case un situations ke liye aapka madad kar sakta hai jahaan witness ke statement ko challenge kiya gaya hai. High Court ne case me decision di thi ki court ko zyada evidence ke liye janne ke liye jaanakar ka statement kaafi nahi hai, aur aapki shuddhi aur witness ke statement ki validity ko verify karne ke liye aur evidence ki aavshyakta hoti hai.