BSA Section 65B: Practical Insights from the Ground
evidence clat_pg beginner internship_learnMaine ek court visit ke dauran ek case dekha jab unhone kaha ki ek witness ne ek document ki copy submit ki hai, lekin original document nahi. Lekin us document ki copy par ek company ki logo thi, jo bahut hi common hai us company ke paas, aur us company ki logo ke saath hi ek certificate bhi attach tha. Magar, us certificate par bhi company ki logo thi.
To, judge ne pucha, "Kya yeh logo ki copy nahi hai, ya logo ki original hai?" Aur us witness ne kaha, "Original hai, Sir." Lekin judge ne us ko bola, "Tumhare paas original logo ki aavashyakata nahi hai, tumhare paas logo ki 'explanation' ki aavashyakata hai.
2 comments
2 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Bhai, don't worry about the complexities of Section 65B. It's just a matter of understanding the technicalities. I've seen it in my own moots, even a slight mistake can make a big difference. But kuchh aisa hai, practice karke aap apni khudari aur confidence badh sakte hain. Ek time aapko yah bhi aasaan lag jayega. Keep working and stay motivated!
Bhai, I totally agree with this. After studying BSA Section 65B, I realized how important it is for companies to be transparent about their related-party transactions. We've seen many cases in India where this lack of transparency has led to corporate governance issues. It's essential for students to understand this section to become future corporate lawyers. Great topic, keep sharing!