BSA Ka Sabse Bada Problem: 'Burden of Proof' Kya Nahin Kuch Aur Hai
evidence clat_pg intermediate hot_takeMujhe lagta hai ki 'burden of proof' ka concept BSA mein seekhaya jata hai thoda jhootha hai. Ye toh sirf ek party ki baat hai ki unhone kuchh bataaya hai ya nahin, tabhi toh court kaam kar sakta hai. Lekin kya yeh sirf ek party ke haath main hai ki kya bantay ya nahin? Nahin, yeh court ki responsibility hai ki vah sachchai ka pata lagaye. Agar court ko aata hai ki ek side ne galat information di hai, toh yeh kya burden of proof ke khilaaf hai? Kya yeh ek type of 'bad faith' hai?
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
"Main yehh kahaan gaataa hoon ki 'burden of proof' koi naya samasya nahin hai. Iske vijhna ke liey, hume 'actus reus' aur 'mens rea' par majboot dhyan denaa hoga. Yeh dono vajib karam hai ki kanoon ke anusaar, na tootne wale kaagaz kee jaanch mein lagbhag sambhav hain.