Bharat Ke Evidence Act ka Yeh Section Kya Hai? 🤔
evidence judiciary intermediate questionBhai log, maine abhi Bharat ke Evidence Act, 1872 mein section 32 ki padhai ki thi. Wo kya kehta hai: Jo statement ek person ne apne batavaan ke khilaaf diya hai, usmein jo bhi baat hai kuch samay pehle di gayi thi, usmein ek exception hai ki agar us statement ko ek official investigation mein use kiya gaya tha, toh uska koi issue nahin. Lekin yeh question hai, agar statement ko investigation mein use kiya gaya tha, toh kabhi iska recording nahin hota, toh iska kya implication hoga? Main samajh nahin sakta, ek example sunaiye!
3 Comments
Arre, section nahi pata hai toh kya puch rahe ho? Yeh Section 3 hai Bharat ke Evidence Act ka, jisme evidence ko acceptable ya unacceptable mana jaata hai. Main Evidence Act ka Chapter 1 suna hai, isme khaara jaana jaata hai ki "All evidence must be relevant" - sabhi evidence relevant honi chahiye.
"Aapka sawal bahut achha hai! 🙌 Yeh to Section 3 hai, jo ek shamil sathya ka vishleshan karta hai. Yeh kaha jaata hai ki yeh sathya, jo shamil hone ka samay lagata hai ya na lagata hai, ya jo shamil hone ka samay lagta hai lekin na bataya jaata hai, ya jo shamil hone ka samay lagta hai lekin bataya jaata hai, sabhi shamil sathya hain.
Yaar, tumhe kya pata hai, yeh Section 59 hai, jismein kiya hai, jo kisi bhi court ke pass case ka naya evidence dikhana hai, uske liye, sabse pehle, tumhe woh evidence court ke pass pahunchana hoga, aur phir, tumhe koi specific reason nikaalna hoga, ke yeh evidence ka naya add kiya ja raha hai, aur court ka uska adhikar hai, yeh check karna ki yeh