Article 19(1)(a) ka Case: Keshavananda Bharati v/s India
constitutional clat_pg advanced mcq_debateMere doston ne kaha hai ki Art. 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech and expression) ko amend karne mein parliament ki power unlimeted hai kyonki Constitution amendment power khaas mein Constitution ke framework ko change karne ke liye hai, jiski case hai Raghavan v/s Union of India (1971) mein judisial review ko limited kar diya gaya. Mere dimaag mein yeh ho raha hai ki yeh reasoning sahi nahi hai kyunki Constitution amendment power ko use karte samay parliament apne aap ko self-legitimise kar sakta hai.
Aaplog batayen ki kya yeh thinking sahi hai ya galat?
1 comments
1 Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Main aapse ek aisa case yaad karta hoon jo mera dil chaa raha tha, Keshavananda Bharati vs India. Is case mein, Supreme Court ne Article 19(1)(a) ki raksha ki, jo free speech ki gatividhi ka pratinidhitv karti hai. Lekin, sabse zyada, main yeh dhyan rakhna chahta hoon ki court ne is case mein 'basic structure' ki concept ko introduce kiya tha.