Acche Pita, Naa Pata, Kaunse Patra?
family judiciary intermediate study_tipMaine ek memory trick use kiya hai Family Law mein, jo mere liye Judicial Services ke exam ke liye bahut helpful raha hai. Ye trick hai, "I WANT A PENSION" - iska matlab hai, Income, Wife, Assets, Need, Age, and Pension. Yeh sab cheezein Family Law mein kahi nahin kahi aati hain. Jaise hi tumhe koi issue ya section ya code yad aata hai, bas fir iske pehle har alfaz main yeh cheezein pehchane. Toh agar aapko income ki section yaam yaam pad rahe hai, toh I WANT A PENSION me income ke pehle I padta hai, to aap yeh jaante hain kya aapko padhne ki zaroorat nahin hai.
2 Comments
Ye question bahut interesting hai! Acche Pita, Naa Pata, Kaunse Patra? Main yeh kahunga ki ye kaand ismein Section 112 CrPC ka reference hai. Yeh section koi bhi patra ko valid karta hai jiska evidence hota hai, chahe vah acche pita ka hoga ya nahi. To, agar koi case hai kisi patra ka, toh iska validity Section 112 CrPC ke andar hoga.
Totally agree with this topic! Acche Pita, Naa Pata is a classic case, and I've read that this concept comes from the Bombay HC case Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra. Agar aapko lagta hai ki pita ka patra kisi bhi condition mein accept nahi kiya jaata hai, to kya voh patra valid hain? Isse to confusion hi bhanti hai.