When Bureaucrats Go Rogue: Navigating Administrative Law in India

**Understanding the Complex Web of Power and Jurisdiction** Administrative Law is the unseen force that shapes our lives, often quietly governing the relationships between citizens, the government, and the courts. As law students gearing up for the CUET PG Law, it's essential to grasp the nuances of this often-overlooked field. From the powers of the executive to the limits of judicial review, Administrative Law is the foundation upon which India's governance is built.

The Constitution's Pillars

The Indian Constitution is the bedrock of Administrative Law, outlining the principles of governance and the role of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Article 14 guarantees equality before the law, while Article 21 protects life and liberty. The Constitution also establishes the principles of federalism, with the Union and states sharing powers in a delicate balance. The Administrative Ministries Act, 1960, and the Rules of Business, 1961, govern the functioning of the central government, outlining the responsibilities of various ministries and departments. But how do these rules impact the lives of citizens? Let's take a closer look at some landmark cases.

Landmark Cases: A Glimpse into the World of Administrative Law

* Calcutta Cloth Market Case (1947): In this seminal case, the Supreme Court established the principle of 'due process,' holding that the government must follow fair and just procedures when exercising its powers. * Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): The Court ruled that Article 21 protects not just life and liberty but also dignity and privacy, setting a precedent for future cases involving fundamental rights. * Kesavananda Bharati v. Union of India (1973): This case established the 'Basic Structure Doctrine,' which limits the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution in a way that undermines its core principles.

The Role of Statutory Bodies and Agencies

Statutory bodies and agencies, such as the Central Information Commission and the National Human Rights Commission, play a crucial role in ensuring accountability and transparency in the functioning of the government. However, their powers and limitations are often shrouded in mystery. As law students, it's essential to understand the scope and limitations of these bodies. The Right to Information Act, 2005, and the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, are two significant laws that have empowered citizens to hold the government accountable. But what happens when these bodies fail to deliver? The answer lies in the realm of judicial review.

Judicial Review: The Last Line of Defense

The Supreme Court and high courts have the power to review administrative actions, ensuring that they align with the Constitution and relevant laws. In cases like Union Carbide v. Union of India (1989) and Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Court has demonstrated its willingness to intervene when the government oversteps its powers. In conclusion, Administrative Law is a complex and multifaceted field that governs the relationships between citizens, the government, and the courts.