The Great Indian Shareholding Saga: Amending the Rules
Kishan ยท LLB Aspirant ยท ๐Ÿ“… 18 Apr 2026 ยท 23 hr ago ยท โฑ 3 min read Published

The Great Indian Shareholding Saga: Amending the Rules

company clat_ug
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, brought about significant changes to Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013, which deals with share capital and debentures. But did your coaching notes get it right? Let's dive into the amendment and explore its implications for Indian companies and law students alike. Our case study will examine the landmark Supreme Court judgment in **Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. (1954)**, which laid the groundwork for the amendment.

Share Capital and Debentures: The Pre-Amendment Scenario

Prior to the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013, governed the issue of share capital and debentures. The section required companies to comply with various formalities, such as providing prospectus, filing returns, and obtaining approval from the Central Government. However, the section was riddled with ambiguities, leading to conflicting court decisions.

The Satyabrata Ghose Judgment: A Landmark Decision

In the **Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. (1954)** case, the Supreme Court of India held that the issue of shares or debentures without a prospectus was not void, but merely voidable at the option of the company. This judgment clarified the law on share capital and debentures, but its implications were not fully addressed until the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020.

The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020: Key Changes

The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, made significant changes to Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013. The key points of the amendment are: These changes aim to simplify the process of share capital and debentures, reducing the compliance burden on companies. However, the amendment has also raised concerns about the potential for misutilization of the simplified process.

Conclusion

The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, has brought about significant changes to the rules governing share capital and debentures. By understanding the pre-amendment scenario, the Satyabrata Ghose judgment, and the key changes introduced by the amendment, law students can better grasp the nuances of company law in India. As we move forward, it's essential to keep in mind the landmark decisions and statutory changes that shape the landscape of Indian company law.

3 comments

3 Comments

Sign in to comment.

Bhai, don't lose heart. The amendment of rules related to shareholding in the Great Indian Shareholding Saga is a welcome step. It brings a much-needed clarity on the threshold of shareholding and voting rights. Although we can debate that it may favour larger corporates, let's give it some time to see its implementation and impact. It's a good start, guys!

"Arre, yeh issue toh bahut saari problems ke peeche hai. Agar hum corporate law mein padhne wale hain to jaante hain ki Companies Act 2013 ke under shareholding rules bahut mushkil hain. Isliye, ismein change karna jaroori hai. Pehle, shareholding ke limits aur rules ko thoda relax kiya jaye, aur phir, corporate governance ko sudharne ke liye aur rules aaye.

Dhanyavad for bringing this topic up. Just wanted to clarify: 'The Great Indian Shareholding Saga' refers to the recent SC judgment that seeks to amend the rules governing shareholding patterns in Indian companies, especially those with listed entities. To cut the story short, the SC has now given Listed Companies the power to allow up to 74% FDI in single brand retail through automatic routes. The SC order has opened up new avenues for foreign investors in India.