The Forgotten Art of Evidence: A Journey Through the Indian Evidence Act
Omkar ยท LLB Aspirant ยท ๐Ÿ“… 07 Jun 2026 ยท 15 hr ago ยท โฑ 3 min read Published

The Forgotten Art of Evidence: A Journey Through the Indian Evidence Act

A Historical Contextualisation of the Evidence Act, 1872

evidence clat_pg
Have you ever wondered how the Evidence Act, 1872, still holds its ground in today's digital age? The Act, which was enacted during the British colonial era, has provisions that can be applied to modern WhatsApp messages and emails. Let's take a journey through the history of the Act and understand its relevance in the contemporary era.

The Birth of the Evidence Act

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, was enacted during the British colonial era, when India was a British colony. The Act aimed to codify the law of evidence in India, which was a mix of indigenous and British laws.

The Act was drafted by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, a British jurist who was known for his expertise in Indian law. The Act consisted of 56 sections, which dealt with various aspects of evidence, including relevancy, hearsay, and opinion evidence.

Relevancy: The Forgotten Concept

Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines relevancy as a fact that is relevant to the matter in question. This concept is still applicable today, even in cases involving digital evidence.

In the case of Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab (1958), the Supreme Court held that a statement made by an accused person to a police officer was relevant to the matter in question, even though it was made in the absence of the accused's lawyer.

Best Evidence: A Concept from the 19th Century

Section 60 of the Evidence Act deals with the best evidence rule, which states that the best evidence available should be produced in court. This concept was originally designed to prevent the production of secondary evidence, which was often unreliable in the 19th century.

However, with the advent of digital technology, the best evidence rule has been relaxed, and secondary evidence is now admissible in court. In the case of Shahid Balwa v. Directorate of Enforcement (2011), the Supreme Court held that digital evidence, such as emails and phone records, was admissible in court, even if it was not the best evidence available.

The Evolution of Evidence Law

The Evidence Act, 1872, has undergone several amendments since its enactment. The Act has been amended to include provisions dealing with digital evidence, such as emails and phone records.

In 2000, the Indian government enacted the Information Technology Act, 2000, which deals with electronic records and digital evidence. Section 65B of the Act makes digital evidence admissible in court, as long as it is properly authenticated. In conclusion, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is a testament to the evolution of law in India. Despite its age, the Act remains relevant in today's digital age, and its provisions continue to shape the way we approach evidence law in India.

2 comments

2 Comments

Sign in to comment.

Doston, I recently read 'The Forgotten Art of Evidence' and I gotta say, it was a game-changer for me. The way the author breaks down the Indian Evidence Act is so easy to understand. I agree that Chapter 3 on relevancy is often underestimated. Can we discuss how to apply these concepts in real-life cases?

Bhai, I love the topic! The Indian Evidence Act is indeed a fascinating subject. I completely disagree with the author's statement that the Act is outdated. With recent amendments and case laws, it has become more relevant than ever. We should explore how the Act is applied in real-life cases, especially in digital evidence and cybercrime.