The CPC Conundrum: A Walkthrough of Section 68
Sneha ยท Bar Exam Prep ยท ๐Ÿ“… 06 Aug 2026 ยท 19 hr ago ยท โฑ 3 min read Published

The CPC Conundrum: A Walkthrough of Section 68

cpc cuet_pg
**Unpacking the Concept of Money Received in the Course of Business** As I delve into the world of Contract Act and Commercial Partnership, I find myself revisiting the venerable Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). A staple of Indian law, CPC provides the framework for civil proceedings, and its provisions are crucial for any law student or practitioner to grasp. The CPC is an exhaustive code, comprising 405 sections and 16 chapters. In this walkthrough, we'll focus on Section 68, which deals with the admissibility of money received in the course of business as a decree. This provision is a crucial tool for litigants seeking to recover debts or damages, but its nuances often lead to confusion. Section 68 of the CPC is often invoked in cases where a party claims to have received a certain amount of money in the course of business, but the opposing party disputes its legitimacy. The section provides that where a party has received money in the course of business, and the amount is not accounted for in their books of account, the court may presume that the money was received on account of the business. However, the burden of proof shifts to the party claiming the decree to show that the money was indeed received in the course of business.

Illustrative Case:** The landmark case of Indian Bank v. Smt. M. S. Srinivasan (1999) 5 SCC 694, is a seminal example of Section 68 in action. In this case, the bank claimed that it had received a sum of Rs. 1.5 lakhs from the defendant, which was not accounted for in their books. The court held that since the bank had not maintained proper accounts, it could not be presumed that the money was received in the course of business. The court ultimately dismissed the bank's claim, highlighting the importance of maintaining proper records in commercial transactions.

Practical Applications:** Section 68 has significant implications for commercial transactions and litigation. In cases where parties dispute the legitimacy of money received, this provision provides a crucial tool for determining the validity of claims. Furthermore, it serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining accurate records in business transactions. The implications of Section 68 are far-reaching, extending beyond commercial transactions to areas such as taxation, finance, and even forensic accounting. As the Indian economy continues to grow and evolve, the importance of understanding CPC provisions like Section 68 cannot be overstated. With the introduction of the IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) and the push towards digital payments, the need for clear and effective commercial law frameworks has never been more pressing. As a law student or practitioner, it's essential to stay up-to-date with the latest developments in commercial law and to appreciate the nuances of provisions like Section 68. Only then can we effectively navigate the complex landscape of Indian commercial law.


1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to comment.

"Kya main bataoon, mere dost Section 68 ke baare main khaas rakhna chahiye. CPC ki is section mein, jo bhi payment unregistered companies ke paas jaata hai woh unki proparty ki shamil hai. Lekin, payment ki prakriti aur unka aasanat kewal kuch factor hain, jaise payment bank account se nahi kiya gaya ho ya payment kise ke naam se kiya gaya ho.