Article on Indian Law
Ayesha ยท Law Student ยท ๐Ÿ“… 14 May 2026 ยท 9 hr ago ยท โฑ 2 min read Published

Article on Indian Law

The Cheque Bounce Hydra: Understanding Section 138 NI Act

criminal judiciary

The Complexities of Dishonour of Cheques in Indian Law

As a law student, I've read Section 138 NI Act so many times I see it in my dreams. Cheque bounce haunts me, but it's a vital part of the Judicial Services exam. Understanding the nuances of dishonour of cheques can make you a formidable candidate.

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is the backbone of cheque bounce cases in India. Section 138 of the Act has been the subject of much litigation, and rightly so โ€“ it's a complex beast. In simple terms, it makes issuing a cheque a legally binding promise to pay.

But what happens when the cheque bounces? That's where the magic happens, or rather, the drama. The payee can file a complaint under Section 138, and the court can impose a penalty of up to two years' imprisonment and a fine. Easy, right? Not quite.

The landmark case of State of Maharashtra v. Manish Maheshwari (2008) clarified that the burden of proof lies on the drawer of the cheque. The payee only needs to prove that the cheque was issued and dishonoured. The drawer, on the other hand, must prove that the cheque was issued for a lawful consideration or that he had sufficient funds in his account.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Bank of India v. Gopal Singh (2013) further highlighted the importance of intent behind cheque issuance. If the cheque was issued with a genuine intention to pay, but the bank had insufficient funds, the drawer may not be liable under Section 138.

However, the judgment in Rajesh B. Agrawal v. Kanak O. Agrawal (2018) emphasized that the court's primary focus should be on the drawer's culpability rather than the payee's loss. This means the court will scrutinize the drawer's actions more closely, making it crucial for aspiring Judicial Services candidates to understand the intricacies of the law.

As Justice Markandey Katju once said, "The law is not a game, nor is it a mere intellectual exercise. It is a serious business, and those who deal with it must be aware of its gravity and importance."


1 comments

1 Comments

Sign in to comment.

Bhailog, you're doing great job on article on Indian Law! Keep it up, yeh hai aapka mazboot point yaar. Don't forget to cover recent judgments and Supreme Court cases. Ek baat, aur research karna aur case studies add karna zaroori hai. Aapke article ko padhkar, duniya ko Indian Law ke baare mein jaanne mein madad mil rahi hogi. Keep rocking, aur main aapko best wishes dena chahta hoon!