Amending the Unamendable: Debunking Myths in Jurisprudence
Uma ยท Judiciary Aspirant ยท ๐Ÿ“… 15 Jun 2026 ยท 22 hr ago ยท โฑ 3 min read Published

Amending the Unamendable: Debunking Myths in Jurisprudence

jurisprudence clat_ug
**Unraveling the mysteries of the Indian Constitution's amendment process** As law students, we've all heard tales of the Indian Constitution's unamendable provisions, but how much of that is fact and how much is fiction? In this article, we'll delve into the world of jurisprudence and separate the myths from the realities of amending the Constitution.

The Unamendable Provisions: A Myth?

The Indian Constitution, in Article 368, outlines the procedure for amendment. However, some provisions are deemed unamendable, including Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees freedom of speech, and Article 21, which protects life and liberty. But is it really impossible to amend these provisions? The answer lies in the interpretation of Article 368(2).

Under Article 368(2), any amendment that alters the basic structure of the Constitution is null and void. But what constitutes the basic structure? This is where the myths start to unravel. The Supreme Court, in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), ruled that the basic structure includes the principles of democracy, socialism, secularism, and the Rule of Law. However, this does not mean that these provisions cannot be amended, but rather that any amendment must be in harmony with these fundamental principles.

Amending the Unamendable: Myth-Busting Points

The Current Relevance of Amending the Constitution

In recent years, there have been calls to amend the Constitution to address issues such as women's reservation, triple talaq, and the Goods and Services Tax (GST). While these amendments may seem like a straightforward process, they must be made with caution to ensure that they do not alter the basic structure of the Constitution. The next time you hear someone say that the Indian Constitution is unamendable, remember that it's not entirely true. While some provisions may be difficult to amend, the Constitution's flexibility allows for changes that respect its fundamental principles. As law students, it's essential to understand the nuances of jurisprudence and the complexities of amending the Constitution.

2 comments

2 Comments

Sign in to comment.

Sab theke theek, this article's intention is to challenge conventional wisdom around unamendable clauses in jurisprudence. It's time to bust some myths! The piece will examine cases where unamendable provisions have been tweaked or removed, highlighting instances where such changes didn't lead to catastrophic consequences. By doing so, it seeks to provide a more nuanced understanding of the role of unamendable clauses in constitutional law, and encourage a more flexible approach to jurisprudence.

Aapke point aur logon kee baat hai. Unamendable provisions ka matlab hai ki ve nai amend ho sakte hain, lekin agar aapko lagta hai ki yeh provisions galti ki wajah hain, to aapko iska sahi tareeke se use karke unhe abolish karne ki koshish karni chahiye. Iske liye, aapko judiciary system ki madad leni padegi.